I suggest furthermore either a second resolution or sections specifically voiding & prohibiting any jab mandates by any employer (sole proprietorship through multinational corporation), government entity at whatever level, any NGO, nonprofit, any association voluntary or otherwise for anyone residing or working in the jurisdiction. (This may seem superfluous to the original, but whether the original passes or not, survives court challenges or not; my suggestion should protect the free people of that jurisdiction from the tyranny of the jab Happy state oppressors.
The spraying of nanoparticulate strontium, barium, and aluminum from the engines of commercial airliners operating throughout the world make those distributed to a relatively small population of "vaccine" recipients pale by comparison. More information at geoengineeringwatch.org .
IPCC scientists warned that aircraft contrails are worse than CO2 as a cause of surface warming - even if the contrails are artificially sprayed. Dane Wigington avoids saying this because he is polarized toward the climate change and UN 2030 agenda. I and others hold the same criticism of Wigington and his habit of making unfounded assertions to boost effectiveness of his doomsday talking points - There's a reason he's well-funded. That's your clue. https://tinyurl.com/mr3dtdc7
You forget.... All the bought and paid-for "experts" are claiming that chemtrails are only contrails. Contrails act the same as chemtrails when they function as artificial "cirrus clouds" to block long-wave radiation (trap heat) from escaping into space. Watch the video again and you'll hear Dr. Joyce Penner say, "The contrails that are spreading, that you can identify as contrails; those would tend to warm the atmosphere" -- So Dr. Penner's quote is in response to the chemtrails video we see on the newscast where she dutifully identified a chemtrail as a contrail. -- Wigington does a good job at exposing the "spraying" but calls it "solar radiation management" (SRM) that wrongly suggests the chemtrails are cooling temperatures when the reverse is actually true. -- Blocking the sun with particulates is only effective at 60,000 feet in the stratosphere. But Chemtrails are sprayed to warm the climate in the troposphere below 40,000 feet AGL. This is why the operation is protected as top-secret at all costs to rational science and expert observation. -- We've watched Wigington work as a limited hangout for over two decades. His motives are twisted toward Agenda 2030. Dane is well-funded, has not worked at an ordinary "job" for over 20 years, has his own weekly, syndicated radio show, owns many acres in the Mt. Shasta region and spent his earlier career working for the corrupt and secretive Bechtel Corp. based in Virginia near the CIA. Bechtel is known for their secretive US government projects as exposed in the 2017 book by Sally Denton: "The Profiteers: Bechtel and the Men Who Built the World". -- Jim Lee at Climate Viewer has an extensive dossier on Wigington.
"WHEREAS, THE NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE PRESIDENT'S 2023 BUDGET verifies mRNA injections contain nanoparticle technologies;"
This is not true. Karen pushes this agenda on purpose. This will ultimately lead to these resolutions being shot down as crazy and not based in fact. I suggest you remove everything not fact based. Just because there is a "nanotechnology initiative" DOES NOT PROVE that the nanotechnology is in Pfizer and Moderna jabs. Please be careful.
well, the Nanotech initiative - it is not a proof of anything in the jabs. It may show government graft. but is not showing anything about the stuff in the vials.
The spraying of nanoparticulate strontium, barium, and aluminum from the engines of commercial airliners operating throughout the world make those distributed to a relatively small population of "vaccine" recipients pale by comparison.
Are the legislators in America all mentally deficient to see statistics that are shown above...and permit such a corrupt industry to exist. In 1986 with The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Congress took away the rights of all Americans to sue the manufacturers of deadly vaccines which were injuring and killing people. Victims had no rights. The Vaccine Court set up with monies from a fee on every shot...did not compensate all the injured who needed help. This vaccine industry would not be as rich and powerful as it is today, if our representatives had been honorable men. This is how dirty politicians got their well-deserved reputations. This Act is called The Dirtiest Deal every American was dealt. BAN THE JAB NATIONWIDE!!!
This is excellent, thank you for sharing. I will be sharing this with others here in Riverside County, should be interesting to see how they behave re this issue.
This is good work I noticed that in section five (B) the proper way to write that is "not nor" rule you shall not do this nor do that. I am still reading this but that stood out to me
Hello, Doc! You are doing a magnificent work for God, country, and citizens. I am simply amazed. I sent out Miss Karen's template demand letter to lots of folks here in Collin County Texas and I just got a lengthy and well thought out response from Congressman Self; he said he voted to stop the mandates and to investigate the origins of the virus. The implication is that's as far as he'll go. Any suggestions on nudging him along towards the ban?
There were also countless violations of ethical principles that could be cited as outlined in the Declaration of Geneva (1948) and the Declaration of Helsinki (1964).
I suggest furthermore either a second resolution or sections specifically voiding & prohibiting any jab mandates by any employer (sole proprietorship through multinational corporation), government entity at whatever level, any NGO, nonprofit, any association voluntary or otherwise for anyone residing or working in the jurisdiction. (This may seem superfluous to the original, but whether the original passes or not, survives court challenges or not; my suggestion should protect the free people of that jurisdiction from the tyranny of the jab Happy state oppressors.
There is actually a health freedom ordinance circulating too. It passed in Collier County.
My other comment notwithstanding, I applaud your work.
The spraying of nanoparticulate strontium, barium, and aluminum from the engines of commercial airliners operating throughout the world make those distributed to a relatively small population of "vaccine" recipients pale by comparison. More information at geoengineeringwatch.org .
IPCC scientists warned that aircraft contrails are worse than CO2 as a cause of surface warming - even if the contrails are artificially sprayed. Dane Wigington avoids saying this because he is polarized toward the climate change and UN 2030 agenda. I and others hold the same criticism of Wigington and his habit of making unfounded assertions to boost effectiveness of his doomsday talking points - There's a reason he's well-funded. That's your clue. https://tinyurl.com/mr3dtdc7
Contrails and chemtrails are totally different.
You must know a Dane Wingington I've never heard of.
He isn't well-enough funded to end the kind of ignorance you harbor about him.
You forget.... All the bought and paid-for "experts" are claiming that chemtrails are only contrails. Contrails act the same as chemtrails when they function as artificial "cirrus clouds" to block long-wave radiation (trap heat) from escaping into space. Watch the video again and you'll hear Dr. Joyce Penner say, "The contrails that are spreading, that you can identify as contrails; those would tend to warm the atmosphere" -- So Dr. Penner's quote is in response to the chemtrails video we see on the newscast where she dutifully identified a chemtrail as a contrail. -- Wigington does a good job at exposing the "spraying" but calls it "solar radiation management" (SRM) that wrongly suggests the chemtrails are cooling temperatures when the reverse is actually true. -- Blocking the sun with particulates is only effective at 60,000 feet in the stratosphere. But Chemtrails are sprayed to warm the climate in the troposphere below 40,000 feet AGL. This is why the operation is protected as top-secret at all costs to rational science and expert observation. -- We've watched Wigington work as a limited hangout for over two decades. His motives are twisted toward Agenda 2030. Dane is well-funded, has not worked at an ordinary "job" for over 20 years, has his own weekly, syndicated radio show, owns many acres in the Mt. Shasta region and spent his earlier career working for the corrupt and secretive Bechtel Corp. based in Virginia near the CIA. Bechtel is known for their secretive US government projects as exposed in the 2017 book by Sally Denton: "The Profiteers: Bechtel and the Men Who Built the World". -- Jim Lee at Climate Viewer has an extensive dossier on Wigington.
"WHEREAS, THE NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE PRESIDENT'S 2023 BUDGET verifies mRNA injections contain nanoparticle technologies;"
This is not true. Karen pushes this agenda on purpose. This will ultimately lead to these resolutions being shot down as crazy and not based in fact. I suggest you remove everything not fact based. Just because there is a "nanotechnology initiative" DOES NOT PROVE that the nanotechnology is in Pfizer and Moderna jabs. Please be careful.
Actually, I put that in. It is a draft. People should feel free to adapt as they see fit.
well, the Nanotech initiative - it is not a proof of anything in the jabs. It may show government graft. but is not showing anything about the stuff in the vials.
There is plenty of evidence of nanotech in the injections. If someone does not like that specific reference they can take it out. Thanks.
Amazing now the rest needs to follow
Brilliant work and a hugely heartfelt thanks
Let us Lee-Countyites know when you propose to submit this to the Commissioners, or talk at a meeting, so that we might attend and support you.
The spraying of nanoparticulate strontium, barium, and aluminum from the engines of commercial airliners operating throughout the world make those distributed to a relatively small population of "vaccine" recipients pale by comparison.
I forgot to mention that more can be learned about the spraying at geoengineeringwatch.org .
Are the legislators in America all mentally deficient to see statistics that are shown above...and permit such a corrupt industry to exist. In 1986 with The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Congress took away the rights of all Americans to sue the manufacturers of deadly vaccines which were injuring and killing people. Victims had no rights. The Vaccine Court set up with monies from a fee on every shot...did not compensate all the injured who needed help. This vaccine industry would not be as rich and powerful as it is today, if our representatives had been honorable men. This is how dirty politicians got their well-deserved reputations. This Act is called The Dirtiest Deal every American was dealt. BAN THE JAB NATIONWIDE!!!
Along The County Lines.
Thank You Sheriff{s} !
This is excellent, thank you for sharing. I will be sharing this with others here in Riverside County, should be interesting to see how they behave re this issue.
This is good work I noticed that in section five (B) the proper way to write that is "not nor" rule you shall not do this nor do that. I am still reading this but that stood out to me
WHEREAS, GET THE ROPE FOR THE NOOSEs READY
cc: Joseph
So Where Is YOUR Scientific Evidence Malone ?
Ralph Baric Said That "Gain Of Function"
Was "Poised" For Human Emergence. Seriously? Okay:
As I Stand, I Bend My Knees, And I Point To The Sky.
I Am "Poised" To Go To Mars .
-You Can Bet Your Ass I'll Get There Before Baric's
Gain Of Function Can Be Viably Sustained In Our Air.
There Is No Gain Of Function Pathogen In The Air.
That's The Hoax - And A Good One. Ain't It Bob ?
Hello, Doc! You are doing a magnificent work for God, country, and citizens. I am simply amazed. I sent out Miss Karen's template demand letter to lots of folks here in Collin County Texas and I just got a lengthy and well thought out response from Congressman Self; he said he voted to stop the mandates and to investigate the origins of the virus. The implication is that's as far as he'll go. Any suggestions on nudging him along towards the ban?
There were also countless violations of ethical principles that could be cited as outlined in the Declaration of Geneva (1948) and the Declaration of Helsinki (1964).