8 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Mr. Ryan Cole is only stating the obvious. Here's another of dozens of Abstracts specifying the damage done. >>> A Systematic REVIEW of Autopsy findings in deaths after covid-19 vaccination >>> Forensic Science International >>> Available online 21 June 2024 >>> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824001968

Forensic Science International is hardly a questionable source. These injections are bio-weapons, period. Thank you to Joseph Sansone for your many efforts.

Expand full comment

Working on my reply brief. Unless they want to make an argument that F.S. 790.166 is unconstitutional, this argument that the Executive Branch can arbitrarily pick and choose which laws to enforce is a usurpation of the other two branches.

Expand full comment

Hello Joseph. I had suggested back in April that you consider the term "Intra vires" when formulating your legal brief. Intra vires are often overlooked by courts legally and Constitutionally obligated and authorized to exercise and enforce the term. It is strange. Intra vires is a legal term that indicates that something is within the legal power of a specific entity or jurisdiction.

Quote: “When used in a law enforcement setting, intra vires indicates, firstly, that the agency has jurisdiction over the crime or suspect. It also indicates that the agency is legally allowed to take the action it is taking. For example, if a law enforcement agency is allowed to question a suspect, such questioning is intra vires. If the agency cannot question the suspect, perhaps because he is a minor and the law requires that a parent be present for questioning, any questioning would be ultra vires.” [End quote]

Complete text: https://www.mylawquestions.com/what-does-intra-vires-mean.htm#:~:text=Intra%20vires%20is%20a%20legal%20term,of%20a%20specific%20entity%20or%20jurisdiction.&text=Intra%20vires%20is%20a,specific%20entity%20or%20jurisdiction.&text=is%20a%20legal%20term,of%20a%20specific%20entity

Expand full comment

Wasn’t Cole recommending the sauce in 2021? Isn’t he a turncoat?

Expand full comment

Yes he is & was publicly corrected by Dr Astrid Stucklburger as to his statement being incorrect that there was no nano-particles ever found. I would never trust anything coming out of his mouth!

Expand full comment

It’s a very similar, if not identical, situation with Peter MacCullough… Unfortunately, yet millions trust his pharma controlled wellness company…

Expand full comment

That's right, and so many people think he is also a savior, I guess they have bad memories or ??

Expand full comment

Hello Alina. I generally haven't followed many of these persons, as it seemed obvious from the start that illegal and criminal acts were taking place. "Mandates" (which are not Laws) and social distancing were two factors that tipped me off. I believe the civilian public needs to focus attention on the illegalities of the situation, rather than medical diplomacy and incompetence.

Expand full comment