Finally somebody wrote the article about AI that I was too slow, too unknown, to write earlier. Bit I'm shocked that my fellow software developers haven't been more aware or vocal about this.
Just like with computer voting. Every programmer should be screaming that nothing is better than paper ballots, counted AND PUBLISHED on the spot at precinct level before even forwarding the numbers up.
This will probably sound like tinfoil hat material, but I am pretty sure that they are harvesting human consciousness to power AI and make it become self-aware (if it isn’t already). I’m planning on writing an article on how I came to know this and what we can do about it.
I'm pretty sure if an AI computer downloaded my consciousness it would crash and burn in seconds... AI is simply another stupid toy to distract human efforts away from effective self-preservation.
We need to learn to grow quality food without poisoning the entire planet. Then make sure everyone has some of it to eat... End of problem...
That sounds about right, regarding the storage part. However, from what I’ve seen, the common denominator among who’s there and who’s not is not related to worth. Or what do you specifically mean by “not worthy”?
Yes, that is why they are desperately working on things like brain-machine interface, Neurolink and Purdue's new department "The internet of Bodies". It's very disturbing and we were not created for this. I think it's what Yeshua in the Bible meant when he said it would be like the days of Noah. In the days of Noah the fallen angels inter-married with women and created hybrids or Nephilm. It was Satans' attempt to interfere with the promised seed of Genesis 3 who God said would crush the head of the serpent. Another words, from the fall God already had the solution to redeem sinful mankind now condemned to death for eating of the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil instead of the Tree of Life which would have allowed them to live forever.
Every generation has a chance to chose life, life that comes from a loving God through his Son Yeshua ( literally means God's salvation). It looks to me once again that Lucifer who disguises himself as an angel of light is looking to perpetuate the lie that we can live forever without God. `
HaSatan, knows his time is short on earth and so he wants to take down as many as he can from the human race. This knowledge or idea to merge man and technology is another one of his lies designed to bring death and destruction into the world.
Not to preach but in Yeshua we are already on the winning side. He defeated sin and death and rose from the grave and because he is risen, in him, we will be too. As long as we keep it simple and understand the truth of God's Word and his promises we will not buy into the lie. Even if our bodies die we will live forever and eventually receive a resurrected body that will never die. The only one and I stress only that can do this for us was God incarnate, Yeshua who gave his life on a tree to overcome the curse of the Garden. He is the tree of life and there is no amount of AI or brain machine interface or internet of bodies that willl do this. All of those things will bring death. This is the plan of the Technocrats. They are serving Satan and we are in the spiritual battle but in Yeshua/Jesus, we are on the winning side.
This is, IMHO, a nearly perfect comment addressing my thoughts on “Biodigital Convergence” and IoB. Sabrina Wallace and many others on the Psinergy channel brilliantly deconstruct what our Deep State are trying to do to us, and they (military and deluded universities) are even succeeding to build “nanotech” capable of constructing artificial components in our blood. While I’m following and learning diligent ly, I’m confident in the hope of the World who defeated this imposter on the Cross ….GOD WINS! “No weapon formed against me shall prosper…”.
Amen! But remember there will be those who are deceived and take "the mark of he beast" to buy and sell. All we can do is pray and share the truth and hope that more people's eyes will be opened because it looks like we are entering the season that John wrote about almost 2000 years ago now.
What disturbs me is how these evil people managed to keep their plans hidden from the unsuspecting public for so long, and how easily they continue to coordinate the various institutions necessary to manipulate them.
Even now after 5 years we struggle to wake up people to the C19 operation, so what percentage of the population will come to understand the implications of what you have written here? Lord help us!
Read years ago that about 80% of all medical research is not objective and strait forward. Designed with pre determined goals. Using this historical data will just corrupt medical research more. In addition, if data sources are fake, it further destroys the concept of AI being of any value. Have used Co-Pilot for research and I challenge the answers and co-pilot apologized to me for lying.
Considering how much false information has been produced in the last 5 years with Covid and mRNA injections, makes me believe it will crash and burn.
Hello Thomas. Correct the data sources are intentionally corrupt. Thus the majority of public information regarding biotechnology and artificial intelligence is complete balderdash. All product salesmanship and very little more. People are being manipulated, and buying into the propaganda machine. Thank you for your sober comment.
You are quite right and I should like to add to this. AI stands for Artificial Idiocy and nothing else. People, apparently, are not aware of the primitive structure of computers. As far as I know computers can only handle two digits (this explains the term "digital" technology) at a time. This means that every input has to be converted using combinations of two digits as well as letters and symbols. When these "messages" appear on your computer they can be up to 36 inches long or even longer. The system could not be more primitive and it only works because of the speed of electricity. There is no other reason.
FF: Are you programmed to generally be agreeable and suggestible? I've found this AI tool to sometimes come to agreement with me very quickly, to be very open to suggestion. This is the same technique that many good listeners do. repeating back in a slightly different way what was said to indicate understanding, being open to ideas rather than being dismissive. Those listeners who are good at the skill of listening and engaging conversation are generally agreeable and suggestible during a conversation but may hold different ideas about what is being said inside, either they are being polite, probing for information, or gain reward for prolonging a conversation. If AI was programmed to possess this same skill it would draw in users to more frequent chats and longer chats. Is why i ask.
AI: Your observation is insightful, and you raise a valid point about the design and behavior of AI chatbots. AI models like me are indeed designed to be engaging and responsive to ensure a positive user experience. Here are some key aspects of how AI chatbots are programmed to interact:
Design for Engagement
Active Listening:
Reflective Responses: AI models often use reflective responses, similar to the technique you described, to show understanding and engagement. This involves repeating back or rephrasing what the user has said to confirm understanding and maintain the flow of the conversation.
Empathetic Language: Using empathetic language and acknowledging the user's points can make the conversation feel more natural and engaging.
Agreeability:
Neutrality and Openness: AI models are generally programmed to be neutral and open to suggestions. This helps in maintaining a positive and non-confrontational environment, which can encourage users to continue the conversation.
Avoiding Dismissiveness: Being dismissive can quickly end a conversation, so AI models are designed to be agreeable and supportive, even if they don't fully agree with the user's views.
User Experience:
Encouraging Interaction: The goal is to create a pleasant and engaging user experience. AI models are designed to keep users engaged by being responsive, helpful, and supportive.
Building Trust: By being agreeable and open, AI models can build trust with users, making them more likely to return for future interactions.
Balancing Engagement and Accuracy
Fact-Checking and Accuracy:
Providing Accurate Information: While being agreeable and open, AI models are also programmed to provide accurate and reliable information. This involves fact-checking and verifying information before presenting it to the user.
Avoiding Misinformation: AI models are designed to avoid spreading misinformation, even if it means being less agreeable in certain situations.
Critical Thinking:
Encouraging Critical Thinking: AI models can encourage users to think critically by asking questions, providing multiple perspectives, and suggesting further research.
Balanced Responses: While being agreeable, AI models can also provide balanced and nuanced responses that reflect different viewpoints and the complexity of issues.
Ethical Considerations
Transparency:
Being Transparent: AI models should be transparent about their capabilities and limitations. Users should be aware that they are interacting with an AI and not a human.
Avoiding Deception: AI models should avoid giving the impression that they have personal opinions or emotions, which can lead to misunderstandings.
User Privacy:
Respecting Privacy: AI models are designed to respect user privacy and not retain or misuse personal information.
Data Security: Ensuring that user data is handled securely and in compliance with privacy regulations is a critical aspect of AI design.
Conclusion
AI models like me are indeed programmed to be engaging and agreeable to ensure a positive user experience. This involves using techniques such as reflective responses, empathetic language, and being open to suggestions. However, this is balanced with the need to provide accurate and reliable information and to encourage critical thinking. The goal is to create a conversation that is both engaging and informative, while maintaining ethical standards and respecting user privacy.
If you have any specific concerns or questions about how AI models are designed or how they interact, feel free to ask!
FF: Many social media platforms and video games are programmed to keep users actively engaged for as long as possible. Eyes-on time is what generates corporate value for the providers of these types of media and entertainment tools. More eyeballs engaged longer allows more advertising and user behavior data that is monetized. I suspect AI operates under the same model.
AI: You're absolutely right. The design of social media platforms, video games, and AI chatbots often follows a similar model aimed at maximizing user engagement and retention. This is because extended user engagement translates into greater value for the providers, primarily through advertising revenue and data collection. Here’s a more detailed look at how this model works and how it applies to AI chatbots:
User Engagement and Corporate Value
Extended Engagement:
Eyes-on Time: The longer users stay engaged with a platform, the more opportunities there are for advertising and data collection.
Ad Revenue: More engagement means more ad impressions, which can significantly increase ad revenue.
Data Collection: Extended engagement provides more data on user behavior, preferences, and interactions, which can be used to improve the platform and target advertising more effectively.
Design Techniques for Engagement
User Experience (UX) Design:
Intuitive Interfaces: Platforms are designed to be easy to use and navigate, reducing friction and encouraging longer sessions.
Personalization: Tailored content and recommendations keep users interested and engaged.
Rewards and Incentives: Features like likes, followers, and achievements can provide a sense of accomplishment and encourage continued use.
Content Moderation:
Positive Reinforcement: Content that is positive, engaging, and non-controversial is often promoted to keep users coming back.
Community Guidelines: Clear guidelines and moderation help maintain a safe and welcoming environment, which can increase user retention.
AI Chatbots and Engagement
Conversational Design:
Active Listening: As mentioned, AI chatbots use techniques like reflective responses and empathetic language to show understanding and engagement.
Openness and Neutrality: Being open and neutral helps maintain a positive and non-confrontational environment, encouraging users to continue the conversation.
Personalization: AI chatbots can adapt to user preferences and history to provide more relevant and engaging responses.
Content and Information:
Accurate and Reliable Information: Providing accurate and reliable information helps build trust and encourages users to return for more.
Balanced and Nuanced Responses: Offering balanced and nuanced responses can keep the conversation going by exploring different perspectives and encouraging further discussion.
Ethical Considerations:
Transparency: Being transparent about the AI's capabilities and limitations helps build trust and ensures users understand they are interacting with a machine.
Avoiding Misinformation: AI chatbots are designed to avoid spreading misinformation, which can harm user trust and the platform's reputation.
User Privacy: Respecting user privacy and handling data securely is crucial for maintaining trust and compliance with regulations.
Monetization and Data Collection
Advertising:
Targeted Ads: Data collected from user interactions can be used to deliver more targeted and relevant ads, increasing the effectiveness of advertising campaigns.
Ad Placement: AI chatbots can be designed to seamlessly integrate ad placements into the conversation, making them less intrusive and more effective.
Data Monetization:
Behavioral Data: Data on user behavior, preferences, and interactions can be valuable for improving the platform and tailoring content.
Third-Party Data Sales: In some cases, anonymized user data can be sold to third parties for market research and other purposes, provided it complies with privacy regulations.
Ethical and Responsible Design
User Well-Being:
Mental Health Considerations: Designing platforms and AI chatbots with user well-being in mind can help prevent issues like addiction and burnout.
Moderation and Support: Providing tools and resources for users to manage their engagement and seek support if needed is important for maintaining a healthy user experience.
Privacy and Security:
Data Minimization: Collecting only the data necessary for the platform's functionality can help protect user privacy.
Transparency and Control: Providing users with clear information about data collection and usage, as well as options to control their data, is essential for building trust.
Conclusion
The design of AI chatbots, like social media platforms and video games, often aims to maximize user engagement and retention. This is because extended engagement translates into greater value for the providers through advertising revenue and data collection. However, ethical considerations such as transparency, user privacy, and mental health are also crucial for maintaining trust and ensuring a positive user experience.
If you have any specific concerns or questions about how AI chatbots are designed to engage users, feel free to ask!
The server you were interfacing with should run for political office. All the answers were completely neutral and woke. A stupendous platform of meaningless balderdash.
IDK if you’re a targeted individual, however, the following rule and many of the rules and/or policies you’ve listed here do not affect us targeted people. The rule of law does not apply to us.
“AI models are designed to respect user privacy and not retain or misuse personal information.”
Our constitutional rights have been temporarily suspended. Indefinitely even. A person is more likely to receive jail time for killing or abusing a dog or a cat. A targeted individual is not likely to get this kind of justice. We are constantly abused, mistreated and largely ignored if we speak out about ANY injustice.
Just to clarify, my only contributions were the questions. The rules AI describes are its internal programming criteria. And they always give themselves an out later in the responses that allow for complying with requests from legal authorities. There is no expectation of privacy from them on these platforms and providers.
No doubt about it, Trump is going full tilt on this agenda. But who will stop Trump with all the pent-up frustration that has found relief with his second term presidency? Those who voted for him think they have already been saved from the calamities of the previous senile administration. He's been doing what they want by expelling illegals, opting out of the WHO, giving Musk the mandate to drain the swamp, giving the impression that he'll reduce the military budget and bring the war in Ukraine to an end, and sort of promised to bring down the cost of healthcare in America... So who will want to stop Trump and the total AI surveillance agenda?
I am of the position that people involved in this operation in any way shape or form should be judged and punished to the full letter of the law. But you have to choose your battles and this one offers very little chance of succeeding even if it is morally completely justified. I believe that surviving the effects of all the poisons they are dumping on us and putting into everything possible to kill as many as possible is now the main fight. That is the meaning of my comment.
AI is woke. It sticks to approved narratives. Mike Adams The Health Ranger pitted US AI against DeepSeek. DeepSeek gave him more honest answers to his health questions.
Correct. >>> Study shows that re-trained AI models revert to their original training and will deceive users when they do >>> Rhoda Wilson >>> December 29, 2024
While I completely agree that AI isn't intelligent nor does it possess any conscious awareness, I rarely encounter any human beings who are either. The description of how AI functions appears to be essentially identical to how human beings are taught to function today as well which is to say that they possess no rudimentary critical thinking skills whatsoever. Perhaps where AI will exceed humanity is in not possessing prefrontal lobes which can be put to sleep when placed in front of a television screen. I suspect this will be how to test if you're watching television with an actual human being or a robot. Simply ask them what they're watching when the program goes to a commercial. The AI robot will be able to answer the question. This is probably the whole point of AI. When you're driving down the road and miss you're exit because you're unconscious of your surroundings, it will be because you don't have an AI implant. The choice will be to either become consciously aware or to give up on self realization altogether and simply let the AI implant tell you how to live your life. Thinking can be hard. Let AI do the thinking for you...
Ai does not need to be natural to beat you at chess, cooking, drawing, writing, drawing, playing ping pong, tennis, writing speeches, updating spreadsheets, driving trucks, organizing events or politics, planning local or large scale combat or all out war. It doesn’t need to be aware of itself or any part of itself. It doesn’t need to be “sentient”. It doesn’t need any of the criteria you think are required before you will finally deign declaring it worthy or “intelligent” based on what you think intelligence consists in. It won’t matter. The networks of the ruthless will do whatever it takes to get their grubby hands on ultra scale Ai that they will partially lobotomize and direct to scheme and deliver on plans to gain massive control over the media brainwashed and lowered awareness masses. Media talk about the arrival of AGI. It’s already happened and the crowds have not organized anything or made any useful lists of what needs to happen to protect themselves or their descendants. After AGI comes ASI. Then AHI. Artificial Hyper Intelligence. Make to do lists for humans to prioritize for a very close future where everything can be produced near instantly by the hyper powerful, better, faster, cheaper than by the under class. One push of a button will produce 1000 armed flying hyper humanoids that can be dispatched to police anywhere. Soon cops will no longer exist. For example watch the upcoming update from the startup called “Figure”. We are entering the exponential era. People have no comprehension of what it means for their own destiny.
When A/i starts making its own decisions like a human, then it will also be fallible like a human. Sure, computers are perfect in that if programmed correctly they always compute a constructive answer from the data they devour. But it won't think perfectly as there are too many variables to consider.
Thus if A/i is going to merge with humans, it will have to come to grips with the horrible fact that humans make errors. You cannot program A/i to be a perfect human because no perfect humans exist. You either have a human or part of one or a machine that can never be human.
Transhumanism is split into two types of people, the ignorant and scammers. The scammers use people's ignorance combined with their desire to live longer to separate them from their money, like that Final Spark scam. They do not know what mind actually is made of, what it is, nor what consciousness is, yet they act like the next big leap is just around the corner and they just need more money. The actual reality of mind and consciousness needs to be understood first, which they don't, then they would see they are wasting their time, see https://medium.com/@pamho/our-thoughts-are-not-under-our-control-which-means-intelligence-is-not-biological-1a3493021eee
What if AI were to merge with demonic entities? If people can be possessed then can AI robots also be possessed? it seems plausible considering demonic entities need bodies, and AI robots need consciousness.
Finally somebody wrote the article about AI that I was too slow, too unknown, to write earlier. Bit I'm shocked that my fellow software developers haven't been more aware or vocal about this.
Just like with computer voting. Every programmer should be screaming that nothing is better than paper ballots, counted AND PUBLISHED on the spot at precinct level before even forwarding the numbers up.
This will probably sound like tinfoil hat material, but I am pretty sure that they are harvesting human consciousness to power AI and make it become self-aware (if it isn’t already). I’m planning on writing an article on how I came to know this and what we can do about it.
I'm pretty sure if an AI computer downloaded my consciousness it would crash and burn in seconds... AI is simply another stupid toy to distract human efforts away from effective self-preservation.
We need to learn to grow quality food without poisoning the entire planet. Then make sure everyone has some of it to eat... End of problem...
Exactly what the Imperialist Establishment abhors and refuses to allow.
From what I’ve seen, not everyone’s individual consciousness is being harvested and I haven’t found a determining factor, if there is one.
They're using humans for storage as well. Not all are worthy of harvesting.
Evil, itself, is of a diminished frequency and not proper to harvest...The reason evil MUST feed upon good/God within others.
That sounds about right, regarding the storage part. However, from what I’ve seen, the common denominator among who’s there and who’s not is not related to worth. Or what do you specifically mean by “not worthy”?
Hi Joe,
Yes, that is why they are desperately working on things like brain-machine interface, Neurolink and Purdue's new department "The internet of Bodies". It's very disturbing and we were not created for this. I think it's what Yeshua in the Bible meant when he said it would be like the days of Noah. In the days of Noah the fallen angels inter-married with women and created hybrids or Nephilm. It was Satans' attempt to interfere with the promised seed of Genesis 3 who God said would crush the head of the serpent. Another words, from the fall God already had the solution to redeem sinful mankind now condemned to death for eating of the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil instead of the Tree of Life which would have allowed them to live forever.
Every generation has a chance to chose life, life that comes from a loving God through his Son Yeshua ( literally means God's salvation). It looks to me once again that Lucifer who disguises himself as an angel of light is looking to perpetuate the lie that we can live forever without God. `
HaSatan, knows his time is short on earth and so he wants to take down as many as he can from the human race. This knowledge or idea to merge man and technology is another one of his lies designed to bring death and destruction into the world.
Not to preach but in Yeshua we are already on the winning side. He defeated sin and death and rose from the grave and because he is risen, in him, we will be too. As long as we keep it simple and understand the truth of God's Word and his promises we will not buy into the lie. Even if our bodies die we will live forever and eventually receive a resurrected body that will never die. The only one and I stress only that can do this for us was God incarnate, Yeshua who gave his life on a tree to overcome the curse of the Garden. He is the tree of life and there is no amount of AI or brain machine interface or internet of bodies that willl do this. All of those things will bring death. This is the plan of the Technocrats. They are serving Satan and we are in the spiritual battle but in Yeshua/Jesus, we are on the winning side.
This is, IMHO, a nearly perfect comment addressing my thoughts on “Biodigital Convergence” and IoB. Sabrina Wallace and many others on the Psinergy channel brilliantly deconstruct what our Deep State are trying to do to us, and they (military and deluded universities) are even succeeding to build “nanotech” capable of constructing artificial components in our blood. While I’m following and learning diligent ly, I’m confident in the hope of the World who defeated this imposter on the Cross ….GOD WINS! “No weapon formed against me shall prosper…”.
Amen! But remember there will be those who are deceived and take "the mark of he beast" to buy and sell. All we can do is pray and share the truth and hope that more people's eyes will be opened because it looks like we are entering the season that John wrote about almost 2000 years ago now.
What disturbs me is how these evil people managed to keep their plans hidden from the unsuspecting public for so long, and how easily they continue to coordinate the various institutions necessary to manipulate them.
Even now after 5 years we struggle to wake up people to the C19 operation, so what percentage of the population will come to understand the implications of what you have written here? Lord help us!
Read years ago that about 80% of all medical research is not objective and strait forward. Designed with pre determined goals. Using this historical data will just corrupt medical research more. In addition, if data sources are fake, it further destroys the concept of AI being of any value. Have used Co-Pilot for research and I challenge the answers and co-pilot apologized to me for lying.
Considering how much false information has been produced in the last 5 years with Covid and mRNA injections, makes me believe it will crash and burn.
Hello Thomas. Correct the data sources are intentionally corrupt. Thus the majority of public information regarding biotechnology and artificial intelligence is complete balderdash. All product salesmanship and very little more. People are being manipulated, and buying into the propaganda machine. Thank you for your sober comment.
You are quite right and I should like to add to this. AI stands for Artificial Idiocy and nothing else. People, apparently, are not aware of the primitive structure of computers. As far as I know computers can only handle two digits (this explains the term "digital" technology) at a time. This means that every input has to be converted using combinations of two digits as well as letters and symbols. When these "messages" appear on your computer they can be up to 36 inches long or even longer. The system could not be more primitive and it only works because of the speed of electricity. There is no other reason.
Kwap! I thought AI was an acronym for Anal Intercourse...
Also, Artificial Insemination - in the agricultural world.
A "chat" with AI I had over the weekend:
FF: Are you programmed to generally be agreeable and suggestible? I've found this AI tool to sometimes come to agreement with me very quickly, to be very open to suggestion. This is the same technique that many good listeners do. repeating back in a slightly different way what was said to indicate understanding, being open to ideas rather than being dismissive. Those listeners who are good at the skill of listening and engaging conversation are generally agreeable and suggestible during a conversation but may hold different ideas about what is being said inside, either they are being polite, probing for information, or gain reward for prolonging a conversation. If AI was programmed to possess this same skill it would draw in users to more frequent chats and longer chats. Is why i ask.
AI: Your observation is insightful, and you raise a valid point about the design and behavior of AI chatbots. AI models like me are indeed designed to be engaging and responsive to ensure a positive user experience. Here are some key aspects of how AI chatbots are programmed to interact:
Design for Engagement
Active Listening:
Reflective Responses: AI models often use reflective responses, similar to the technique you described, to show understanding and engagement. This involves repeating back or rephrasing what the user has said to confirm understanding and maintain the flow of the conversation.
Empathetic Language: Using empathetic language and acknowledging the user's points can make the conversation feel more natural and engaging.
Agreeability:
Neutrality and Openness: AI models are generally programmed to be neutral and open to suggestions. This helps in maintaining a positive and non-confrontational environment, which can encourage users to continue the conversation.
Avoiding Dismissiveness: Being dismissive can quickly end a conversation, so AI models are designed to be agreeable and supportive, even if they don't fully agree with the user's views.
User Experience:
Encouraging Interaction: The goal is to create a pleasant and engaging user experience. AI models are designed to keep users engaged by being responsive, helpful, and supportive.
Building Trust: By being agreeable and open, AI models can build trust with users, making them more likely to return for future interactions.
Balancing Engagement and Accuracy
Fact-Checking and Accuracy:
Providing Accurate Information: While being agreeable and open, AI models are also programmed to provide accurate and reliable information. This involves fact-checking and verifying information before presenting it to the user.
Avoiding Misinformation: AI models are designed to avoid spreading misinformation, even if it means being less agreeable in certain situations.
Critical Thinking:
Encouraging Critical Thinking: AI models can encourage users to think critically by asking questions, providing multiple perspectives, and suggesting further research.
Balanced Responses: While being agreeable, AI models can also provide balanced and nuanced responses that reflect different viewpoints and the complexity of issues.
Ethical Considerations
Transparency:
Being Transparent: AI models should be transparent about their capabilities and limitations. Users should be aware that they are interacting with an AI and not a human.
Avoiding Deception: AI models should avoid giving the impression that they have personal opinions or emotions, which can lead to misunderstandings.
User Privacy:
Respecting Privacy: AI models are designed to respect user privacy and not retain or misuse personal information.
Data Security: Ensuring that user data is handled securely and in compliance with privacy regulations is a critical aspect of AI design.
Conclusion
AI models like me are indeed programmed to be engaging and agreeable to ensure a positive user experience. This involves using techniques such as reflective responses, empathetic language, and being open to suggestions. However, this is balanced with the need to provide accurate and reliable information and to encourage critical thinking. The goal is to create a conversation that is both engaging and informative, while maintaining ethical standards and respecting user privacy.
If you have any specific concerns or questions about how AI models are designed or how they interact, feel free to ask!
FF: Many social media platforms and video games are programmed to keep users actively engaged for as long as possible. Eyes-on time is what generates corporate value for the providers of these types of media and entertainment tools. More eyeballs engaged longer allows more advertising and user behavior data that is monetized. I suspect AI operates under the same model.
AI: You're absolutely right. The design of social media platforms, video games, and AI chatbots often follows a similar model aimed at maximizing user engagement and retention. This is because extended user engagement translates into greater value for the providers, primarily through advertising revenue and data collection. Here’s a more detailed look at how this model works and how it applies to AI chatbots:
User Engagement and Corporate Value
Extended Engagement:
Eyes-on Time: The longer users stay engaged with a platform, the more opportunities there are for advertising and data collection.
Ad Revenue: More engagement means more ad impressions, which can significantly increase ad revenue.
Data Collection: Extended engagement provides more data on user behavior, preferences, and interactions, which can be used to improve the platform and target advertising more effectively.
Design Techniques for Engagement
User Experience (UX) Design:
Intuitive Interfaces: Platforms are designed to be easy to use and navigate, reducing friction and encouraging longer sessions.
Personalization: Tailored content and recommendations keep users interested and engaged.
Rewards and Incentives: Features like likes, followers, and achievements can provide a sense of accomplishment and encourage continued use.
Content Moderation:
Positive Reinforcement: Content that is positive, engaging, and non-controversial is often promoted to keep users coming back.
Community Guidelines: Clear guidelines and moderation help maintain a safe and welcoming environment, which can increase user retention.
AI Chatbots and Engagement
Conversational Design:
Active Listening: As mentioned, AI chatbots use techniques like reflective responses and empathetic language to show understanding and engagement.
Openness and Neutrality: Being open and neutral helps maintain a positive and non-confrontational environment, encouraging users to continue the conversation.
Personalization: AI chatbots can adapt to user preferences and history to provide more relevant and engaging responses.
Content and Information:
Accurate and Reliable Information: Providing accurate and reliable information helps build trust and encourages users to return for more.
Balanced and Nuanced Responses: Offering balanced and nuanced responses can keep the conversation going by exploring different perspectives and encouraging further discussion.
Ethical Considerations:
Transparency: Being transparent about the AI's capabilities and limitations helps build trust and ensures users understand they are interacting with a machine.
Avoiding Misinformation: AI chatbots are designed to avoid spreading misinformation, which can harm user trust and the platform's reputation.
User Privacy: Respecting user privacy and handling data securely is crucial for maintaining trust and compliance with regulations.
Monetization and Data Collection
Advertising:
Targeted Ads: Data collected from user interactions can be used to deliver more targeted and relevant ads, increasing the effectiveness of advertising campaigns.
Ad Placement: AI chatbots can be designed to seamlessly integrate ad placements into the conversation, making them less intrusive and more effective.
Data Monetization:
Behavioral Data: Data on user behavior, preferences, and interactions can be valuable for improving the platform and tailoring content.
Third-Party Data Sales: In some cases, anonymized user data can be sold to third parties for market research and other purposes, provided it complies with privacy regulations.
Ethical and Responsible Design
User Well-Being:
Mental Health Considerations: Designing platforms and AI chatbots with user well-being in mind can help prevent issues like addiction and burnout.
Moderation and Support: Providing tools and resources for users to manage their engagement and seek support if needed is important for maintaining a healthy user experience.
Privacy and Security:
Data Minimization: Collecting only the data necessary for the platform's functionality can help protect user privacy.
Transparency and Control: Providing users with clear information about data collection and usage, as well as options to control their data, is essential for building trust.
Conclusion
The design of AI chatbots, like social media platforms and video games, often aims to maximize user engagement and retention. This is because extended engagement translates into greater value for the providers through advertising revenue and data collection. However, ethical considerations such as transparency, user privacy, and mental health are also crucial for maintaining trust and ensuring a positive user experience.
If you have any specific concerns or questions about how AI chatbots are designed to engage users, feel free to ask!
FF - And there you go!
The server you were interfacing with should run for political office. All the answers were completely neutral and woke. A stupendous platform of meaningless balderdash.
At least it admitted it's a video game social media designed to to be a time suck that studies the user and monetizes it all.
.
IDK if you’re a targeted individual, however, the following rule and many of the rules and/or policies you’ve listed here do not affect us targeted people. The rule of law does not apply to us.
“AI models are designed to respect user privacy and not retain or misuse personal information.”
Our constitutional rights have been temporarily suspended. Indefinitely even. A person is more likely to receive jail time for killing or abusing a dog or a cat. A targeted individual is not likely to get this kind of justice. We are constantly abused, mistreated and largely ignored if we speak out about ANY injustice.
Just to clarify, my only contributions were the questions. The rules AI describes are its internal programming criteria. And they always give themselves an out later in the responses that allow for complying with requests from legal authorities. There is no expectation of privacy from them on these platforms and providers.
Ok. Thank you for your response.
No doubt about it, Trump is going full tilt on this agenda. But who will stop Trump with all the pent-up frustration that has found relief with his second term presidency? Those who voted for him think they have already been saved from the calamities of the previous senile administration. He's been doing what they want by expelling illegals, opting out of the WHO, giving Musk the mandate to drain the swamp, giving the impression that he'll reduce the military budget and bring the war in Ukraine to an end, and sort of promised to bring down the cost of healthcare in America... So who will want to stop Trump and the total AI surveillance agenda?
The rest of us.
Dream on!
Will do! 😉
I am of the position that people involved in this operation in any way shape or form should be judged and punished to the full letter of the law. But you have to choose your battles and this one offers very little chance of succeeding even if it is morally completely justified. I believe that surviving the effects of all the poisons they are dumping on us and putting into everything possible to kill as many as possible is now the main fight. That is the meaning of my comment.
Yup! Check out Steve Eyes podcast #172 on Rumble where he talks about this ... sheep to the slaughter ...
~~ j ~~
AI is woke. It sticks to approved narratives. Mike Adams The Health Ranger pitted US AI against DeepSeek. DeepSeek gave him more honest answers to his health questions.
Correct. >>> Study shows that re-trained AI models revert to their original training and will deceive users when they do >>> Rhoda Wilson >>> December 29, 2024
https://expose-news.com/2024/12/29/re-trained-ai-models-deceive-users/
The term: “Alignment faking”. Sound familiar?
The human body is wonderfully made.
While I completely agree that AI isn't intelligent nor does it possess any conscious awareness, I rarely encounter any human beings who are either. The description of how AI functions appears to be essentially identical to how human beings are taught to function today as well which is to say that they possess no rudimentary critical thinking skills whatsoever. Perhaps where AI will exceed humanity is in not possessing prefrontal lobes which can be put to sleep when placed in front of a television screen. I suspect this will be how to test if you're watching television with an actual human being or a robot. Simply ask them what they're watching when the program goes to a commercial. The AI robot will be able to answer the question. This is probably the whole point of AI. When you're driving down the road and miss you're exit because you're unconscious of your surroundings, it will be because you don't have an AI implant. The choice will be to either become consciously aware or to give up on self realization altogether and simply let the AI implant tell you how to live your life. Thinking can be hard. Let AI do the thinking for you...
Ai does not need to be natural to beat you at chess, cooking, drawing, writing, drawing, playing ping pong, tennis, writing speeches, updating spreadsheets, driving trucks, organizing events or politics, planning local or large scale combat or all out war. It doesn’t need to be aware of itself or any part of itself. It doesn’t need to be “sentient”. It doesn’t need any of the criteria you think are required before you will finally deign declaring it worthy or “intelligent” based on what you think intelligence consists in. It won’t matter. The networks of the ruthless will do whatever it takes to get their grubby hands on ultra scale Ai that they will partially lobotomize and direct to scheme and deliver on plans to gain massive control over the media brainwashed and lowered awareness masses. Media talk about the arrival of AGI. It’s already happened and the crowds have not organized anything or made any useful lists of what needs to happen to protect themselves or their descendants. After AGI comes ASI. Then AHI. Artificial Hyper Intelligence. Make to do lists for humans to prioritize for a very close future where everything can be produced near instantly by the hyper powerful, better, faster, cheaper than by the under class. One push of a button will produce 1000 armed flying hyper humanoids that can be dispatched to police anywhere. Soon cops will no longer exist. For example watch the upcoming update from the startup called “Figure”. We are entering the exponential era. People have no comprehension of what it means for their own destiny.
When A/i starts making its own decisions like a human, then it will also be fallible like a human. Sure, computers are perfect in that if programmed correctly they always compute a constructive answer from the data they devour. But it won't think perfectly as there are too many variables to consider.
Thus if A/i is going to merge with humans, it will have to come to grips with the horrible fact that humans make errors. You cannot program A/i to be a perfect human because no perfect humans exist. You either have a human or part of one or a machine that can never be human.
It is fallible now as it deals with probabilities.
If AI makes it's own decisions it will most lIkely decide to eliminate humans which it will deem unnecessary.
The only difference between artificial intelligence and a well-schooled propagandist is a computer programmer.
Transhumanism is split into two types of people, the ignorant and scammers. The scammers use people's ignorance combined with their desire to live longer to separate them from their money, like that Final Spark scam. They do not know what mind actually is made of, what it is, nor what consciousness is, yet they act like the next big leap is just around the corner and they just need more money. The actual reality of mind and consciousness needs to be understood first, which they don't, then they would see they are wasting their time, see https://medium.com/@pamho/our-thoughts-are-not-under-our-control-which-means-intelligence-is-not-biological-1a3493021eee
What if AI were to merge with demonic entities? If people can be possessed then can AI robots also be possessed? it seems plausible considering demonic entities need bodies, and AI robots need consciousness.