Is Trump Morphing into Bush on Foreign Policy and Civil Liberty Issues?

The Trump administration is apparently adopting a foreign policy that is much more aggressive than advertised when campaigning. Candidate Trump reminded voters that he had not started any new wars in his first term and suggested that he would cut the Pentagon Budget in half.

The reality is that Trump has just proposed the first trillion-dollar DOD budget and in March started a bombing campaign in Yemen. Trump even bragged about bombing a hundred or so people in Yemen posting the video on social media. Somewhat ghoulish….

The Trump administration is threatening bombing Iran. This could have devastating effects on the world economy and geopolitics. Fortunately, Trump did not sanction recent Israeli plans to attack Iran. In the case of Russia and Ukraine, Trump has worked to deescalate the conflict. This effort could be negated if war with Iran breaks out.

The Trump administration has continued the Biden era war on free speech and has redirected it from speech about COVID toward speech critical of Israel. The administration has branded speech critical of Israel as antisemitic speech. This is an extraordinary assault on the First Amendment.

It goes without saying that the First Amendment protects antisemitic speech as it does anti Catholic speech, or any other kind of unapproved speech. Americans have a right to hate Jews, Catholics, white people, black people, and everyone in between. They also have a right to express such hatred in nonviolent ways. The reality is that what is considered racist, sexist, bigoted speech, is much more subjective than is advertised.

What makes the Trump administration actions so extraordinary is that the administration and many Republicans are conflating criticism of Israel and Zionism with hatred of Jews. In the eyes of the Trump administration, to criticize the foreign nation state of Israel is antisemitic speech.

A foreign nation state is so privileged that the basic rights of Americans must be ignored to placate this foreign power?

This means that Christians that practice the teachings of Christ and speak out against the genocide in Gaza are antisemites?

A two-tier society must then be created where Jews are above criticism, and all other races and religions are fair game?

A disturbing video of a Tufts University graduate student being arrested by government agents in street clothes, some of whom are masked, has gone viral. The student is a foreign national from Turkey and had written op eds critical of the genocide in Gaza.

This appears to be a thought crime, although, there appears to be no crime other than criticizing Israel. Contrary to what some believe, free speech is a Natural Right that the American founding fathers believed was gifted by God and preexisted and transcended the existence of government. Deporting college students that are legally in the United States for criticizing Israel or the Israeli genocide in Gaza is a despicable assault on the First Amendment. If they are legally here, they have the same basic civil rights as Americans.

If it can be done to them it can be done to us. This is exactly what some Republicans and Democrats in Congress have been trying to do. According to the Jewish Insider:

The legislation codifies a Trump-era executive order declaring that antisemitism is a prohibited form of discrimination in schools and universities, and that the Department of Education should use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism in assessing cases of antisemitic discrimination.

The Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism gives examples. Here are a few of them:

Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

With arguably the exception of calling for violence, these are mainly pure thought crimes. Critical thinking requires individuals to question narratives they’ve been fed. After all, in an abstract sense, the story is never actually true. It is what it is, everything else is basically a psychological projection.

So, if a researcher determined that the actual number of Jews killed in NAZI Germany was less than the number of 6 million that would mean they are antisemitic?

Pointing out that Netanyahu behaved like a NAZI when he said that Israel would be a laboratory for the ‘COVID vaccines’ and then injected 90% of Israelis with mRNA bioweapon injections, would define one as an antisemite?

Questioning pedophile blackmailer CIA/Mossad agent, Jeffrey Epstein’s loyalties, would make one antisemitic?

Criticizing the genocide in Gaza and comparing Israeli policy in this regard to NAZIS would make one an antisemite?

So, it is okay for the left to talk about the White Power Structure, but examining potential Jewish influence in the media, economy, government, or other societal institutions, is antisemitic?

We hear about the Italian Mafia, Russian mob, Chinese, mob and so on. What about the Jewish mob? Are Jews angels and above criticism?

Will such restrictions be placed on all criticism of all religions? What about races?

Does this apply to the entertainment industry?

Every other word in many movies is the use of the name ‘Jesus Christ’ in a blasphemous manner. These screen plays are often written, directed, produced, and acted, by non Christians.

Should this too become a prosecutable offense?

The Irony is that regular American Jews have varied opinions on Israel and Israeli policy. These definitions would label many Jews as antisemites. Criticizing Israeli policy does not make one antisemitic any more than criticizing the policies of the Roman Catholic Church makes one anti-Christian.

If only Congress was given some guidance on how to best deal with these kinds of issues regarding speech. Oh wait, they have been provided with some guidance.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Hmmmm. There really doesn’t seem to be any wiggle room…..

Free speech means free speech. We’re not talking about yelling fire in a crowded theater or terrorizing the public about an invisible enemy. Intellectual discourse requires that there be no taboo topics of discussion. There will be discussions, debates, and disagreements. This empowers a population. Censorship of political discourse does not. The tendency toward censorship is a temptation that will always be there, and it must be resisted. A free society requires that all perspectives be given a voice even if we find these perspectives objectionable.

The Trump administration is seeking to implement the Real ID. The dangers of this post 911 scheme to create a National ID will not be fully understood until everyone has this digital ID. Think ‘vaccine’ passports etc.

To make matters worse, reportedly, Trump is looking at the Enemy Combatant Act to be used to deport violent American criminals to overseas prisons such as El Salvador.

Alex Jones, states,

“Trump Falsely Believes The Enemy Combatant Act Gives Him The Legal Authority To Designate American Citizens As Terrorists For Committing Violent Crimes, So They Can Then Be Deported To Offshore Prisons.”

After the 911 false flag attack, those of us that were against the so called Patriot Act and the Enemy Combatant Act, and all the police state measures at the time, the unpatriotic wars, etc., warned that these measures would be used against Americans. In fact, the argument on the Enemy Combatant Act was that it was only a matter of time before that was used on American citizens.

These are issues worth fighting for and should unify people of all backgrounds. The Bill of Rights is sacrosanct and these stupid Neocon wars are designed to bankrupt the United States and clear the path for world government.

Trump voters need to resist these measures and speak out against them the loudest. These are betrayals that do not put America First. Freedom is still popular….

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi here.